next up previous contents
Next: 5.3.2.3 Speed-up Up: 5.3.2 Results Previous: 5.3.2.1 Spherical compared to

5.3.2.2 Dependence on the parameters

Kernel PCA depends on the number of principal components q and the width of the Gaussian kernel $ \sigma$. For the ring-line-square distribution, the quality measure and the fractional variance, explained by the principal subspace in feature space, increased with increasing q (table 5.1). A limit in the quality was reached at about 30 principal components. For 20 principal components, the covered variance also increased with the width $ \sigma$. However, the quality was almost constant about the tested $ \sigma$ values, with a slight peak at $ \sigma$ = 0.5 (table 5.2). For the same parameters, the results for the vortex distribution were similar. Here, the optimum was at about $ \sigma$ = 0.1. The reason for the difference is the smaller variance of the vortex distribution, which requires the optimal $ \sigma$ to be smaller.


Table 5.1: Dependence of the quality Q and variance v--explained by q principal components--on the number of principal components q, for $ \sigma$ = 0.3 and the ring-line-square distribution.
q v Q
10 51.5% 77.1%
20 76.3% 86.5%
30 88.5% 94.2%
40 94.5% 93.7%


Table 5.2: Dependence of the quality Q and the variance v--explained by 20 principal components--on the Gaussian width $ \sigma$, for the ring-line-square distribution.
$ \sigma$ v Q
0.1 25.6% 85.6%
0.3 76.3% 86.5%
0.5 94.3% 87.7%
0.7 98.7% 82.2%


next up previous contents
Next: 5.3.2.3 Speed-up Up: 5.3.2 Results Previous: 5.3.2.1 Spherical compared to
Heiko Hoffmann
2005-03-22